WEEK 22
During week 22 I have concentrated on research for my essay since handing in four assignments (Final essay proposal; Negotiated practice with budget for the final show; Concise Logbook aka Research Journal & Professional Portfolio (website)).
I am beginning to form ideas for the final show and all the work I have been doing over the last six months, which is coalescing into something more tangible, through information I have been reading and some of the exhibitions and people I have been seeing and meeting. Some of the ideas I have been coming across have become part of the work I have been working on during week 23, which I will discuss in a moment.
I have been reading the work of Jacques Ranciere, Karl Marx, Lucy Lippard and Susan Sontag and Victor Burgin has popped up in their work, so it looks like I might be looking at his work too.
The reading I have been seeking is looking at the relationship between painting and photography involving what is being considered as the androgynous or hermaphrodite between these two media. By this the ideas involve the relationship between the boundaries between the two in how there is no definitive line between the two. If we think about the etymology of what photography means; its root ‘drawing with light’. As a painter I have always thought of painting as a manipulation of light; the manipulation of colour frequencies which give the illusion of colour to our minds.
Painting and Photography
Rosemary Hawker mentions in her essay Idiom: Post-medium that ‘the hermaphrodite and androgynous are conditions that rely on the external differences with which they intersect, so therefore we should not understand Foucault’s description in terms of homogeneity… Foucault’s point would be that such an image is at once both photograph and painting, which is not to say that it is a combination of the two… Photography and painting are apprehended at once and in the same place, that is, in the image.’[i]
In these terms it is clear that there is a relationship between the two medias that when one is painting from a photograph, there is another element which is brought to the painting that captures something other than what is actually in the photographic image. There is a transfusion or transformation of energetic qualities from the mind of the artist which is contained within the painting that does not exist in the photographic. This is to say the mechanical approach with the photograph only captures what lies before the film or digital image and it is upon the observer of the image who brings a set of qualities, judgements and prejudices to the piece. The participation of oneself within the work is inescapable. When the viewer looks at the work, whether this is a photo or a painting, it is clear there is no passivity in the way the image has been created; in the way it has been cropped, set up, positioned and manipulated through its process of creation etc… Each of us participate via a criticality of the image, whether this is conscious or not. Even if you walk away thinking it was rubbish or uninspiring, you are participating and give the piece its autonomy.
One thing I have become more aware of through my research also is that some painters I admire have used projections of photographic imagery to create their images directly before painting them in, like Gerhard Richter. I thought they painted from looking at the photograph and painting their response to the work, not literally copying from projection [in a sense they are continuing from where Caravaggio and Vermeer left off with their alleged use of the Camera Obscura.[ii]
In terms of the reason for creating their photo-paintings and utilising aspects of the idioms of the photographic image is to highlight and make us aware of these idioms. The out of focus blurs and sharpness (Richter); the flatness of the image’s perspective (Warhol) and an awareness of using two eyes instead of one through expressionism (Van Gogh, Lucian Freud); and how the human eyes create a slight curved effect in how we perceive reality (Cezanne) and the constant shifting of our mind’s perception, revealing how it interprets reality based upon the presented and how our memory, because everything we see is always in the past, interacts with the present moment.
WEEK 23
The research I am doing towards my extended essay about how my art practice relates to my use of the photographic image and its relation to painting, as mentioned above, has led me to the work I created during this reading week.
During the last six months I have been creating drawings, illustrations and paintings taking images from photographic material, printed and digital, seeing how I re-interpret these images into paintings and drawings, to see or reveal how much of the image is a response to my emotive reactions to what it is I am seeing. This can be in terms of the composition, how it is cropped, placed, arranged; the colours or lack of colours; the mark-making in strokes, scratches, gauges; size of the canvas, shape and form etc…
In some way my artwork is creating a form of self-portrait, as Francis Bacon says “My painting is a representation of life…”. In some ways I am not choosing to create a self-portrait of the individual, in this case me, but rather as representative of the society I belong. Of the culture I have grown up and been a part of; a self-portrait of YOU. I assemble images of what I see and respond to in print, the newspaper or from the internet; the social networks; the commodity advertised – but not the commodity of goods and services. This is about the commodity of the politicised, the polemic, the dispossessed and the largely forgotten, until it is too late to help. A commodity of propaganda that cannot give what you need; love, friendship, community and understanding. No matter how much we lie to ourselves for the sake of our pensions, jobs and GDP.

UNTITLED | Mixed Media & Photgraphic | April 2012 | Adam R. Grose
I have taken photocopies of my paintings and writing to create billboard displays. Creating a representation of a billboard, in this case one that has the appearance of the worn, un-used, forgotten. Stripped of its glamour, its promise, its lies; to reveal the layers of the previous. Yet, these are drawings and paintings of these objects, of people, of events; an interpretation of a simulation of reality. The photographic has become a drawing/ painting to become a photocopy to become a collage, to become a photograph to be a painting… which will become again a photographic image. A copy of a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy…

UNTITLED (detail) | Mixed Media & Photgraphic | April 2012 | Adam R. Grose
The repetition of the copy re-interpreted into a critique of our repeated patterns of the copy. An interpretation from a selection process of the once beautiful and desirable; reduced to a forgotten promise in time. To re-display in the public space as an artwork that the passer-by whom may think and inquire as art or pay no attention to; thinking it is just a board left forgotten to the elements, to return back to the forgotten and the obscure.

UNTITLED | Mixed Media & Photgraphic | April 2012 | Adam R. Grose
HEVVA HEVVA!
During this week I was invited by Jan Knowell, from Art and Environment, to an exhibition that took place at Eden in Cornwall. It was a group of artists who were responding to ideas about the environment. The many artists have come from a variety of disciplines and took part in the three day short course; developing ideas and creating work in response.
The exhibition is an excellent investigation into the environment and the challenging inquiry into the way art can respond to the effects of climate change, nature, alternative creative ways of seeing the world and viewing another’s perception of this reality.
I found this exhibition stimulating, intriguing and insightful and I have written a response to it which I will make available on here once complete, which will include photographs from the exhibtion.[iii]
WEEK 24
During this week I decided to have a break and spend some quality time with my family and check out some exhibitions in Bristol and London. I also did a lot of reading too on the train, bus and in the evenings.
I managed to see the following shows:
BRISTOL
At the Arnofini gallery my sister, my niece and myself saw work by;
- Shilpa Gupta: Someone Else
- Sophy Rickett: To The River
- At the Bristol Museum and Art Gallery I got to see ten drawings by Leonardo Da Vinci as part of the Royal Collection
LONDON
I travelled to London by bus to see;
- Lucian Freud exhibition at the Nation Portrait Gallery, of which I spent 4.5hrs
- Jeremy Dellor: Joy in People, of which I spent 2.5hrs
I will have a detailed write up about these shows from my notes soon…
Adam R . Grose BA(Hons), PGCE, MIfL
[i] Rosemary Hawker,
Idiom Post-medium: Richter Painting Photography, (OXFORD ART JOURNAL: Vol 32.2, 2009) p.273
[ii] BBC Entertainment, ‘Carravaggio was [an] early photographer‘, (BBC Arts & Culture, 11th March 2009), <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/7936946.stm> [Accessed 20th March 2012]
[iii] Eden Project, Hevva Hevva, <http://www.capefarewell.com/news/events/661-hevva-hevva.html> [Accessed 16th April 2012]